The workshop will be held virtually on Friday, 21 May 2021, 13:00 PM – 15:00 hours, Bangkok time.
- List of Participant - WS on 5YP TWG on Disaster Statistics (21-May-21).pdf
- Draft Five-year plan of Technical Working Group (TWG) on Disaster-related Statistics
- Post-workshop Five-year Plan
- Event Webpage
- Meeting Record
Objectives:
to finalize the 5-Year Strategic Plan of the TWG that is required to support countries to establish disaster-related statistics
to identify the priority areas where the countries needs support from the 5-Year Plan
to identify priority areas where the countries can extend support to the 5-Year Plan
to formulate a work program for the TWG for 2021 based on the 5-Year Plan
Programme:
Time | Activity | Remarks | Outcome |
13:00-13:10 | Opening Session: (10 minutes) ● Welcome Remarks (ESCAP) ● Official opening of the workshop ● Roundtable introduction of participants Icebreaker: Write your name and your country | ● Welcome greetings (Maria Talento) ● Linkage of the workshop, FYP and the TWG with the global processes and a short briefing re the workshop (Rikke Munk Hansen) ● TWG Chair, (Ariunaa Chadraabaal) ● Puji Pujiono, ESCAP Consultant | Understanding of the importance of the FYP and how it relates to the work at the country, TWG, and with global processes An Icebreaker cum introduction exercise |
13:10-13:20 | Review of the Plan (presentation and Q&A) (10 minutes)
Using Confluence Platform | Presentation by Puji: Puji requests participants to log in to the Confluence and open the Draft Plan Puji: Highlight of the Plan, and the expected feedback, confirmation or deliberation in the workshop | Appreciation of the plan’s content and timeline Participants get to be more familiar to the use of Confluence |
13:20-13:35 | Country reflection (individual/pair) (15 minutes)
Using the Confluence as platform for the poll, it will aggregate the responses to provide highlights of participants’ responses to the topic/question | Participants respond to a rating scale Poll#1: Country reflection: Participants reflect on their countries: a. Where a country stands relative to certain aspects of DRSF Based on that reflection, participants will give feedback on: b. The extent that their country will need support from the FYP c. The extent that their country will contribute to the FYP | Illustration of what country needs from, and potential to contribute to, the FYP Participants needs to log in to the Confluence
This helps underscore the importance of the FYP to the countries’ move on DRSF |
13:35-14:20 | Discussion (45 minutes)
Participants will be assigned to three break out rooms by random for a certain length of time using the Teams app. The participants will revise the 3 priority areas of the 5-yr plan document assigned to them using the Confluence platform. After the discussion, the participants will automatically be transferred back to the main room.
Group a. Strengthening technical capacity (Chair & Maria) Links to Group 1 Discussion Board Group b. Contributing to international standards (Rikke); and Links to Group 2 Discussion Board Group c. Supporting members’ governance of disaster statistics (Vasiti & Puji ) | Breakout Room discussions: to be led by TWG chair and vice chairs and facilitated by the Secretariat to review and revise the Plan. a. What do countries need from and willing to contribute to, FYP? b. What needs to be added/revised/deleted from the FYP? c. What other notes participants want to pass on to the TWG? | Based on results of the preceding country reflection poll, discuss how the draft FYP can be strengthened Expected result: a more realistic, pragmatic, and responsive draft FYP |
14:20-14:50 | Synthesis (30 minutes)
Back in the main room
Each sub-group will choose a rapporteur to report on the changes/inputs to the plan’s structure. | Introduction of Poll #2 (Puji) “How important is the FYP to the development of DRSF in your country”? Rapporteurs take turn to read out the highlight of the breakout rooms results: a. Major changes in the Draft FYP b. Other notes to the TWG Synthesis of the reports, confirmation of participants’ acceptance of the results (Puji) | Chair: (Mongolia) The Poll is to help participants transition from the breakout to the plenary Report out from the breakout rooms |
14:50-15:00 | Closing Session (10 minutes) Follow through actions Closing Remarks | Call for volunteer to report in the next TWG meeting (Maria) Closing Remarks, ESCAP (Rikke) Official closing (Chair) | Very short term action plan |
Poll #1: Country Reflections
Item 1: name of your country |
| ||
At present, where is your country situated now relative to the aspects of DRSF | To what extent does your country NEEDs SUPPORT FROM the 5 Year Plan | To what extent would your country EXTEND SUPPORT TO the 5 Year Plan | |
0: nothing happened yet; 1 (low) to 4 (high) | 0: not relevant; 1(Least) to 4 (Most) | 0: not relevant; 1(Least) to 4 (Most) | |
Item 2: policy that regulates the integration of disasters data and statistics | |||
Item 3: policy or agreement that contains the division of tasks between disaster management agencies and the statistics office | |||
Item 4, committee, task force, or working group on disaster statistics that involve both the disaster agency and statistics office | |||
Item 5: mechanism concerning how disaster-related data are being collected and compiled from the different agencies/sectors | |||
Item 6: procedure concerning how disaster-related data are being published, disseminated, or shared among concerned agencies | |||
Item 7: procedure concerning the use of disaster-related data for disaster management and development planning | |||
Item 8: standardised definition and classification of disaster | |||
Item 9: common formulation to calculate disaster damage and losses | |||
Item 10: reporting of disaster related matters in Sendai and SDGs | |||
Poll# 2:
How useful is the TWG Five Year Plan to your country? (1: least useful; 4: most useful)
- Will serve as a benchmark for country’s performance
- Will provide guidance for regional directions
- Will provide stimulus to catalyse country process
- Will build common fronts with other member countries
- Will serve as a guide towards contributing to the global process